[address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Daniel Velea
elvis at velea.eu
Thu Jun 23 11:48:22 CEST 2016
Hi, Excuse the briefness of this mail, it was sent from a mobile device. > On Jun 23, 2016, at 09:26, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > > Hi, > >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:49:35PM +0300, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote: >> let's also chip in the possibility to make /64 assignments while >> redefining the definition. plenty that keep coming at the RIPE Meeting >> with all kind of cases where they want to use IPv6 (PI) but membership >> is not accesible. >> >> https://ripe72.ripe.net/presentations/114-RIPE72-IPv6-PI.pdf > > No, IPv6 PI policy is a different topic and needs to be covered by a > different proposal. I only proposed this because in my mind it could have easily been solved when redefining the end site definition. /elvis > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]