[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Remco van Mook
remco.vanmook at gmail.com
Tue May 17 14:46:02 CEST 2016
> On 17 May 2016, at 14:44 , boggits <boggits at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 17 May 2016 at 13:08, Remco van Mook <remco.vanmook at gmail.com <mailto:remco.vanmook at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Let's hear your thoughts. I'll be at the RIPE meeting next week where I'll be talking about this proposal during the first APWG session. > > So this includes LIR's who already have (through acquisition of other companies) multiple /22 from the last /8 It doesn't apply retroactively - so if you have already merged LIRs and are currently holding multiple /22s form the final /8 you're fine. It does stop future cases though. Remco -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160517/41d0f54f/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160517/41d0f54f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]