[address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Mon May 30 18:53:10 CEST 2016
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:44:05PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: >RIPE policy does regulate IP allocations and under what >conditions you are allowed to have/transfer/etc them. I agree >that RIPE policy cannot regulate an organisation's M&A itself, >but what happens to IP allocations when M&A happens definitely >is in scope. RIPE policy has, until recently, explicitly recognised that M&A (and what happens to resources due to those) is not in scope for the PDP. It is only since "last /8" that certain elements of the "community" have tried, by hook or by crook, to arrogate themselves the right to decide what happens to resources in the event of M&A. rgds, Sascha Luck > >Not expressing any opinion in favour or against, just clarifying >scope :) > >Cheers, Sander >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]