[address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sun Sep 24 13:48:33 CEST 2017
Hi, On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Willy MANGA wrote: >> So again, why do they rely on v4 (only) ? I really want to understand >> hurdles on european continent. >> >> I hope this time, it will be clearer :) > > same reason as in africa: for most organisations it's too much work with > too little return. Or in any other part of the world... > Many humans will only react after a crisis hits, even if the cost of > that is higher overall. Exactly! Cheers, Carlos > Nick > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]