[address-policy-wg] Assignments have legacy status, not IP addresses themselves

Hi David,

 

I never though on this from your perspective, and I think you’re right.

 

However, the point about M&A it is a bit more complex. If it is just a pure “renaming” of the company I will agree with you, but there are cases, where is not really a new “version of the organization”, in fact it may be just a way for a business to obtain IP addresses, or an ISP join/buy smaller ones to become bigger, etc. I think trying to differentiate those cases will make it very difficult.

 

However, there is an independent problem, which is getting services for free, which are being covered by the rest of the membership.

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 21/10/20 13:57, "address-policy-wg en nombre de David Farmer via address-policy-wg" <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de address-policy-wg at ripe.net> escribió:

 

The concept that the legacy status applies independently to resources or IP addresses, separate from their assignment to a resource holder, seems incorrect. The legacy status applies to the assignment of resources to a resource holder before the creation of the RIRs, but not to the resources or the IP addresses themselves. 

 

All IPv4 addresses were created at the same time. When they were assigned for use differs; therefore, when they were assigned for use and to whom they are assigned for use is what matters.

When addresses are transferred to a different organization, a new assignment is made, or in other words, they are reassigned. And it seems proper that the new assignment no longer has the legacy status, as they are now assigned to a different organization.

When a merger or acquisition occurs, we also call that a transfer, but it is a transfer to a new version of the same organization, not to a different organization. In this case, it seems propers that the assignment maintains its legacy status, as the same organization, just a different version of the same organization, continues to hold the assignment.  

 

The legacy status is important and is not a mistake because, as a community, we believe it is important to maintain the uniqueness of the assignments made before the creation of the RIRs. However, at least in my opinion, it is a mistake to believe that the legacy status applies to IP addresses independent of who holds the assignment.

 

Thank you.
-- 

===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota   
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
=============================================== 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20201021/fea3cb1f/attachment.html>