[address-policy-wg] 2023-01 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Tue Feb 7 12:01:24 CET 2023
Angela Dall'Ara wrote on 09/01/2023 10:40: > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this > four-week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide > feedback to the proposer. not sure if this comment is in time, but the text contains: > Assignments strictly larger than a /24 will only be made to IXPs that > offer the exchange of IPv4 routing information over IPv6 at their > route servers As far as I understand, this protocol is not widely deployed in IXPs, nor is it widely tested in inter-AS production environments. It would be concerning if an untested protocol were mandated as a production requirement in a RIR addressing policy document. Before continuing down this path, could the authors provide information on how this protocol works in production environments? Nick
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]