Hello, I am glad to see that I am not alone. However, I am still worried that several people voted for a free beer. OK, free beer is nice if somebody is ready to pay it ;-(), but this case is a different one. The problem is that the limits of the technology can not be changed by voting and concensus declaration. AND the whole policy addresses global issues. The policy proposal was a very bad message for other regions. Liberty to pollut (in this case: the global routing table) is not a liberty for me. Thanks, G�za <div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Randy Bush <<a href="mailto:randy@psg.com">randy@psg.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">> I would certainly hope that these objections will not be ignored > but considered addressed. </div>the concerns (which careful reading of the thread would show that i shared with geza) were not 'addressed' in the sense of overcome. �</blockquote> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> randy </blockquote></div>