<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">It is a strange question as<div>"<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; ">This document provides information about the current Internet Numbers</span><pre class="newpage"> Registry System used in the distribution of globally unique Internet
Protocol (IP) address space and autonomous system (AS) numbers. It
also describes the processes used for further evolution of the
Internet Numbers Registry System. This document does not propose any
changes to the current operation of this system.</pre><div>"</div><div><br></div><div>Dima</div><div><div>On Oct 2, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Hans Petter Holen wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>In August the IETF published RFC7020 "" The Internet Numbers Registry System"<br>as a replacement for RFC2050. <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7020">http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7020</a><br><br>A question came up at today's Address Council call today:<br>- "Does any of the global or regional policies need review following this?"<br><br>I assume not - but it could be good to have the wg participants thoughts on this too.<br><br><br>-- <br>Hans Petter Holen<br>Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | <a href="mailto:hph@oslo.net">hph@oslo.net</a> | <a href="http://hph.oslo.net">http://hph.oslo.net</a><br><br><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>