<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/04/16 10:01, Jan Ingvoldstad
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAEffzkzNbzj2Rtd3REhCmEj_RSZ3iDxf2-_mocLcg3-R1a=0HA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 8:52 AM,
Adrian Pitulac <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:adrian@idsys.ro"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:adrian@idsys.ro">adrian@idsys.ro</a></a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
</div>
</div>
I see the same explanation again and again and again. But
I see no real argument from you guys. No statistics, no
trending, no prediction, just "keep the ipv4 last longer".
Can you do better than that?<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br clear="all">
<div>Is this your best argument *for* the policy? That you
haven't read enough posts well enough to find the arguments
against, nor to find the statistics, the trends, the
predictions? Seriously?</div>
-- <br>
<div class="gmail_signature">Jan</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">Jan, I think you should read my previous
posts, I've come up with several arguments, none of which have
been seriously discussed and analyzed. <br>
<br>
Also FYI I've been reading the discussions here for a long time,
and this intervention is my first because I see the same
explanation again and again without no base. <br>
<br>
This should be a discussion on arguments not just a presentation
of personal "default" denial of any change to policy. This is what
I saw until now. I was under the impression that people here can
start a discussion and analyze the *for* and *against* arguments
until we reach a conclusion. Am I wrong?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>