<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 11/05/2016 09:02, Roger Jørgensen ha
scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAKFn1SFqXjkXnY5ScLUXeLCPfKmBXVBCspLQ2RyPp6Sv=vZ7Vw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Randy Bush <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:randy@psg.com"><randy@psg.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">you may find reading the actual last /8 policy informative.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Last /8 is not really get affected by this policy.
- Additional /22 IPv4 allocations can be only provided from address space
outside 185/8
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
this is misleading or just sadly misinformed
last /8 is not an address range, it is a state reached once the ncc had
only that address range and continues on irrespective of additions or
subtractions of space to the ncc's pool.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
minor correction, it is a state that was reached once IANA allocated the
last /8 to all the RIR's, and it affect _all_ address space after that point.
</pre>
</blockquote>
If I am not wrong standing on the information collected on this list
the new allocation criteria was triggered when first allocation from
185/8 has been made.<br>
<br>
Please see Ingrid Wijte email 20/04/2016 to the list<br>
[...]<br>
The RIPE NCC started to allocate from 185/8 on 14 September 2012,
when we could no longer satisfy a request for address space without
touching 185/8. That moment triggered section 5.1 that states that
RIPE NCC members can request a one time /22 allocation (1,024 <span
onclick="javascript:goto_glossary_definition(1)"
onmouseout="javascript:hide_glossary_definition_popup(this, 1)"
onmouseover="javascript:show_glossary_definition_popup(this, 1)"
class="highlightedGlossaryTerm">IPv4</span> addresses). <br>
[...]<br>
<br>
My understanding is that the policy was already there but the
community (we) at that date considered fair end up the good part of
cake before triggering the new rule<br>
Rumors says that there are a lot of suspicius allocation done just
one or two weeks before triggering the "last /8"<br>
<br>
regards<br>
Riccardo<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<pre>Ing. Riccardo Gori
e-mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rgori@wirem.net">rgori@wirem.net</a>
Mobile: +39 339 8925947
Mobile: +34 602 009 437
Profile: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943">https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943</a>
</pre>
<img src="cid:part1.C20E5265.65571509@wirem.net" width="200">
<pre>WIREM Fiber Revolution
Net-IT s.r.l.
Via Cesare Montanari, 2
47521 Cesena (FC)
Tel +39 0547 1955485
Fax +39 0547 1950285
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re-
plying to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:info@wirem.net">info@wirem.net</a>
Thank you
WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
</pre>
</div>
</body>
</html>