<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body smarttemplateinserted="true">
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:34189379-6FFE-4607-9B31-F076E12B703B@rfc1035.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On 4 Feb 2019, at 13:58, Daniel Karrenberg <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dfk@ripe.net"><dfk@ripe.net></a> wrote:
The question before us is: What is the minimum useful allocation?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Well yes Daniel.
But how long does that discussion last? Perhaps 5-10 years from now we’ll be debating policies on how the NCC allocates /30s or /31s of v4. :-)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<div id="smartTemplate4-template"><br>
</div>
<div>No, because (hopefully) the prefix filters on the v4 Internet
will never EVER allow anything smaller than a /24 to be routed on
the open Internet ... <br>
</div>
<div>Allowing LIRs to obtain their /22 - even if it is in up to 4
subnets - will be a lot better than not being able to supply _any_
v4 addresses to those late adopters due to only having the
policies with /22 ...</div>
<div><br>
-garry</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>--<br>
<pre>Garry Glendown * Professional Services & Solutions
NETHINKS GmbH | Bahnhofstraße 16 | 36037 Fulda T +49 661 25 000 0 | F +49 661 25 000 49 | <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:garry.glendown@nethinks.com">garry.glendown@nethinks.com</a>
Geschäftsführer: Uwe Bergmann, Bastian Marmetschke Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Garry Glendown | AG Fulda HRB 2546
PGP Fingerprint: B1CF 4952 F6EB E060 8A10 B957 700E F97F B412 DD32</pre>
<p> </p>
</div>
</body>
</html>