<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body smarttemplateinserted="true">
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEffzkynRqdXTuSQhqcrg02eudEbW8rfRHX6pVKV1jxeFZHMmA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div>and then you were presented with the simple flag, "250 GB
sufficient: yes/no"</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>What would you choose?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>My bet is that you would choose "no" and request 1 TB.</div>
-- <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div id="smartTemplate4-template">Slight difference: we're talking
about a scarce resource here, which - depending on your choice -
might or might not be available. So the choice is rather:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1) packs of 250GB, 500GB or 1TB up to a total of 1TB (packs
might not be available at the same time)<br>
</div>
<div>2) 1TB in on pack of 1TB</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Though, thinking about the billing, RIPE has to (or should)
define how to do the billing based on the number of resources ...
currently, billing is per resource, not sure if this will be kept
if due to availability issues this would remain (in essence,
increasing the price for LIRs that have to take multiple /24
instead of one /22) or whether they would still receive their
initial fragmented /22 amount of IPs included as "first resource"
...<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
-garry<br>
<div><br>
--<br>
<pre>Garry Glendown * Professional Services & Solutions
NETHINKS GmbH | Bahnhofstraße 16 | 36037 Fulda T +49 661 25 000 0 | F +49 661 25 000 49 | <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:garry.glendown@nethinks.com">garry.glendown@nethinks.com</a>
Geschäftsführer: Uwe Bergmann, Bastian Marmetschke Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Garry Glendown | AG Fulda HRB 2546
PGP Fingerprint: B1CF 4952 F6EB E060 8A10 B957 700E F97F B412 DD32</pre>
<p> </p>
</div>
</body>
</html>