[anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Sat Nov 7 22:15:29 CET 2015
In message <20151106224453.GG47126 at cilantro.c4inet.net>, "Sascha Luck [ml]" <aawg at c4inet.net> wrote: >On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 11:38:52PM +0100, Sander Steffann wrote: >> >>But the RIPE NCC isn't an official party in that contract. The >>contract is between end user and LIR. > >Well... Considering that such a contract must be submitted to, >and approved by, the RIPE NCC (or it will not result in the >assignment of resources); I'm of the opinion that a court might >well see the NCC as a party. It is both refreshing and surprising to finally find something that Mr. Luck and I can agree on. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]