[anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Mon May 9 11:39:51 CEST 2016
Marilson, At 2016-05-07 09:33:01 -0300 "Marilson" <marilson.mapa at gmail.com> wrote: > > But as Shane wrote: > True although apparently in this case it is not an e-mail issue. :) > ?? The RIPE document is recommendations for spam. The abuse reported is apparently not spam (although I don't think that we don't know the exact details). Therefore the RIPE document is probably not helpful. Perhaps it would be worthwhile making a general best practice document with recommendations for handling abuse, but I don't think that such a RIPE document exists now. Cheers, -- Shane -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160509/e75edf04/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]