[anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02 Review Phase Reminder
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02 Review Phase Reminder
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02 Review Phase Reminder
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Sat Feb 17 05:44:54 CET 2018
On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 20:47:36 +0100 Alexander Isavnin <isavnin at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reminder! > > Better late than never. > > I strongly oppose to this proposal. > > 1) With a lot of words about improving trust and safety in Proposal's > summary, there is no evidence about issues with trust and safety with > uncheked "abuse-c:" I posted an actual IP with an auto responder that requires web form completion - where the web form itself has so many hoops and is broken. You did not bother telling me that I made a mistake or that the example company suddenly changed their behavior? Instead you simply choose to post: "there is no evidence about issues" > 2) In my experience, real abusers have all their contacts valid (and > responsive). In my experience not 100% of abusers have their contacts valid and not 100% responsive. Never mind that there is no such thing as "real abusers" (abusers are abusers), some companies simply drop incoming abuse-c, some companies have fake auto responders, etc. etc. > 3) Why only abuse-c have to be checked? There are a lot > of different contacts or information, that could be verified. > Sure, but this is anti-abuse-wg > Also, RIPE NCC executive just got extraordinary powers to revoke > resources. This is just fake news / and / a completely incorrect/wrong statement. If you still think I am wrong - please elaborate and supply evidence. > So we have to be very carefull with policies, which may > lead to resource revocation just because of e-mail issues (i had such > issues with RIPE NCC mail servers). > Also completely wrong because it is built on a wrong statement. > Plus all other arguments against or concerning about this proposal, > raised in discussion previously. > sure, this makes a lot of sense :) > Kind regards, > Alexander Isavnin > > > > Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02 Review Phase Reminder
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02 Review Phase Reminder
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]