[anti-abuse-wg] [Misc] Research project on blacklists
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [Misc] Research project on blacklists
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [Misc] Research project on blacklists
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Barry Greene
barryrgreene at gmail.com
Wed Jul 17 19:01:16 CEST 2019
Not a joke. Just a researcher exploring ways to quantify and measure. Always important to have the academic doing the due diligence on our operational assumptions. > On Jul 17, 2019, at 07:40, ac <ac at main.me> wrote: > > > This is a joke email, right? > > Is it the 1st of April already? :) > > Andre > > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 13:42:21 +0200 > Anushah Hossain <anushah at icsi.berkeley.edu> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'm a researcher at UC Berkeley and the International Computer Science >> Institute. My colleagues and I are working on evaluating and >> improving the accuracy of blacklists. As part of this work, we'd like >> to hear from you about the blacklists you currently use, what you >> perceive as their strengths and weaknesses, and any thoughts you have >> on how they might be improved. >> >> We've prepared an anonymous survey where you can share your views: >> https://berkeley.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_200mg5hnQiAOgUl >> >> If you have five to ten minutes free today to fill it out, I would >> greatly appreciate your help! Thank you, and please don't hesitate to >> respond to me with comments or questions. >> >> (Apologies if you receive this message twice - trying to minimize >> cross-posting while still reaching a broad audience) >> >> Best, >> Anushah >> > >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [Misc] Research project on blacklists
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [Misc] Research project on blacklists
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]