[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sun Mar 24 16:16:04 CET 2019
On Sun, 24 Mar 2019, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: (...) > What do feelings have to do with NCC membership? There are many > members of the RIPE NCC I'd rather not share the organisation > with but that is not reason to deny them membership. > :feelsbadman: It was only a small point about "membership" -- which land registries don't have. >> Also, i have read allegations about a "monopoly" regarding the service >> region. Afaik, there is a transfer market which contradicts the concept of >> said "monopoly" (i.e. can't get more addresses from the RIR, then go to the >> market). > > that's not an "allegation", it is a STATEMENT OF FACT. The "ip > address market" rgument is wholly invalid because the transfer > policy clearly states that transfers can only happen to a RIR > member. The only exception is legacy space that was never brought under > RIR authority. There you have it...... legacy space is part of that address market, hence no "monopoly". :-)) Regards, Carlos > rgds, > SL >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]