[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legality of proposal (apologies)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri May 17 12:07:09 CEST 2019
Hi, On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:45:19AM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg wrote: > If two validations are done per year, I don't think this is > significant overhead for any resource holder vs the benefits of the > time saving for the same resource holders that need to use the abuse > mailbox of a counterparty that today is escaping from a real > validation and creating troubles with abuse emails to someone else. Please do not speak for a LIR's abuse contact here. These are (usually) good guys that have too much work and too little time to actually *work on fixing abuse in their network*. Your proposal steals life time from these guys, while not helping at all with folks that just ignore mails sent to their (working and verified!) abuse mail address. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190517/a791d792/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legality of proposal (apologies)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]