[anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Jan 16 02:09:10 CET 2020
In message <ltfqNUBPM7HeFA88 at highwayman.com>, Richard Clayton <richard at highwayman.com> wrote: >bottom line is that if you want to run a reputation site and not be >under an obligation to remove libellous material (not fair comment) you >would be unwise to do it outside the USA As much as I would like to claim, on behalf of my countrymen, an absolutely unique status in this regard, I do believe that there are any number of other locales from whence a similar feat could be accomplished. Iceland seems like a possibility, but also Belize, perhaps Gibraltar, The Dominican Republic, and quite certainly Nevis & St. Kitts. Oh! And the sovereign Republic of Sealand, of course. Regards, rfg P.S. I cannot help but offer the entirely gratuitous observation that in many parts of the world it may indeed be more legally tenable to be either a spammer or a spam-fiendly provider than it is to be a person or other form of legal entity which publishes anything not qualifying as glowing positive commentary about any such.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]