<div dir="auto">4 March is a travel day for me. But ill be happy to fill the doodle pol<div dir="auto">Best</div><div dir="auto">Salam</div></div> <div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Feb 21, 2022, 18:21 Leo Vegoda <<a href="mailto:leo@vegoda.org">leo@vegoda.org</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Antony, A poll would be a great idea. Thanks, Leo On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 9:03 AM Antony Gollan <<a href="mailto:agollan@ripe.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">agollan@ripe.net</a>> wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > That's understandable - maybe it's worth doing another poll to see which > days/times in an average week are doable for people? > > Cheers > > Ant > > On 21/02/2022 17:47, Brian Nisbet wrote: > > Antony, All, > > > > I don't object to any of this in principle, and it may be that we need > > to increase the frequency of our calls, however I will flag that as > > things open up a bit more, Fridays are an increasingly bad day for me. I > > won't be able to make a meeting on the 4^th at our normal time (I would > > be able to at 11:00 or 12:00 CET, but that's far too early for Leo). The > > 11th at our normal time should be better, albeit I'll either be in a car > > or on a train at that point in the day. > > > > As it happens the 18^th of March is a once off bank holiday in Ireland, > > but I may still be able to join the call that day. > > > > TL;DR I'm being awkward, sorry. But while I wasn't going anywhere Friday > > afternoons were fine, but that is changing. If it's still the best time > > for everyone else I will, of course, do my best to make calls. > > > > Brian > > > > Brian Nisbet (he/him) > > > > Service Operations Manager > > > > HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network > > > > 1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland > > > > +35316609040 <a href="mailto:brian.nisbet@heanet.ie" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">brian.nisbet@heanet.ie</a> <a href="http://www.heanet.ie" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">www.heanet.ie</a> > > > > Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* coc-tf <<a href="mailto:coc-tf-bounces@ripe.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">coc-tf-bounces@ripe.net</a>> on behalf of Antony Gollan > > <<a href="mailto:agollan@ripe.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">agollan@ripe.net</a>> > > *Sent:* Monday 21 February 2022 16:14 > > *To:* <a href="mailto:coc-tf@ripe.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">coc-tf@ripe.net</a> <<a href="mailto:coc-tf@ripe.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">coc-tf@ripe.net</a>> > > *Subject:* [coc-tf] Updating Meeting Schedule > > CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the > > organisation. Do not click on links or open the attachments unless you > > recognise the sender and know the content is safe. > > > > > > Dear TF members, > > > > I actually seem to have removed all of our upcoming meetings. Rather > > than putting everything back as it was, I'm thinking it might make more > > sense to book the next call for 4 March, so we don't have to wait > > another two weeks. And on that call, we could also look at whether it's > > time to change to weekly calls, given the RIPE Meeting is rapidly > > approaching. > > > > Let me know if there's any objections to this approach - otherwise I'll > > book this in tomorrow. > > > > Cheers > > > > Ant > > > > On 21/02/2022 16:43, Antony Gollan wrote: > >> Dear TF members, > >> > >> In deleting the meeting invite for this Friday, I also removed the one > >> on 11 March by mistake. I'll create another invite for that. > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> Ant > >> > >> On 21/02/2022 16:33, Leo Vegoda wrote: > >>> Hi TF, > >>> > >>> We will not meet this Friday. This is partly because we will not all > >>> be able to attend and partly because there is a chance some of the > >>> materials to discuss will not be ready in time. > >>> > >>> I'd like to invite everyone to take a look at the updated straw man > >>> proposal I shared last week. You can find it here: > >>> > >>> <a href="https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/coc-tf/2022-February/000313.html" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/coc-tf/2022-February/000313.html</a> > > <<a href="https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/coc-tf/2022-February/000313.html" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/coc-tf/2022-February/000313.html</a>> > >>> > >>> There are several questions to address, so please share your thoughts > >>> on what should change and what to do where there is a gap. > >>> > >>> Many thanks, > >>> > >>> Leo > >>> > > > > -- > > coc-tf mailing list > > <a href="mailto:coc-tf@ripe.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">coc-tf@ripe.net</a> > > <a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/coc-tf" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/coc-tf</a> > > <<a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/coc-tf" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/coc-tf</a>> > > -- > coc-tf mailing list > <a href="mailto:coc-tf@ripe.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">coc-tf@ripe.net</a> > <a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/coc-tf" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/coc-tf</a> -- coc-tf mailing list <a href="mailto:coc-tf@ripe.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">coc-tf@ripe.net</a> <a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/coc-tf" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/coc-tf</a> </blockquote></div>