[db-wg] creating a second route object

Hi Aleksi

Here we discuss the semantics of how the database applies the logic for
route object creation. If you want to discuss the logic, I suggest you move
over to the routing-wg and talk with other routing experts :)

cheers
denis
co-chair DB-WG


On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 14:52, Aleksi Suhonen <ripe-ml-2024 at ssd.axu.tm>
wrote:

> Hi and thanks for getting back so quickly,
>
> Route objects are supposed to be ships in the night. I guess we need to
> start a new PDP so that only the inetnum* mnt-* fields affect the
> creation of new route* objects. Changing and deleting existing route*
> objects should continue to use their own maintainer fields.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> On 15/04/2024 15:42, denis walker wrote:
> > Hi guys
> >
> > It is not unintended behaviour or a bug. It is by design. See
> >
> https://apps.db.ripe.net/docs/Authorisation/Protection-of-Route-Object-Space/#authorisation-rules-for-creating-route-objects
> <
> https://apps.db.ripe.net/docs/Authorisation/Protection-of-Route-Object-Space/#authorisation-rules-for-creating-route-objects
> >
> >
> > There used to be a flow chart showing this but I can't find it now.
> >
> > cheers
> > denis
> > co-chair DB-WG
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 13:55, Cynthia Revström via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net
> > <mailto:db-wg at ripe.net>> wrote:
> >
> >     The same thing occurs if there's a less specific route(6) object.
> >
> >     I would suspect that this is probably unintended behaviour?
> >
> >     -Cynthia
> >
> >     On Mon, 15 Apr 2024, 13:12 Aleksi Suhonen via db-wg, <db-wg at ripe.net
> >     <mailto:db-wg at ripe.net>> wrote:
> >
> >         Hi,
> >
> >         When migrating a route from one ASN to another, the best
> >         practice is to
> >         create a second route(6) object for it with the new origin. The
> >         creation
> >         of the new object is dependent on the "mnt-routes:" field of the
> >         enclosing inetnum(6) object.
> >
> >         Am I correct thus far?
> >
> >         Because I'm running into an issue. When trying to create a new
> >         route
> >         object using the LIR portal, I'm getting an error that the route
> >         is not
> >         authenticated by the maintainer of _the other_ route object.
> >
> >         Am I missing something obvious, or have I found a bug/regression?
> >
> >         BR,
> >
> >         --
> >                  Aleksi Suhonen
> >
> >                  () ascii ribbon campaign
> >                  /\ support plain text e-mail
> >
> >         --
> >
> >         To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder,
> >         or change your subscription options, please visit:
> >         https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
> >         <https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg>
> >
> >     --
> >
> >     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or
> >     change your subscription options, please visit:
> >     https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
> >     <https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg>
> >
>
> --
>         Aleksi Suhonen
>
>         () ascii ribbon campaign
>         /\ support plain text e-mail
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20240415/613ef39e/attachment.html>