I see. Thank you for this explanation.�<div> </div><div>Damien <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Shane Kerr <<a href="mailto:shane@time-travellers.org">shane@time-travellers.org</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Dear unnamed person, This is not the RIPE NCC's database... they maintain it, and they use it, but it is the RIPE Database - for the entire RIPE community. Still, preventative steps have been taken - if you download the data on maintainers then the passwords are not present. Also, the database limits the volume of queries that users can make, to prevent harvesting that way. These were done with coordination of the RIPE community. The RIPE Database has always been completely public. The idea is that you do not have to trust the RIPE NCC to keep secrets. This protects the RIPE NCC, and it also protects us, the users. It also prevents users accidentally exposing secret information by confusing which parts are public and which are private - it is all public. In my mind there are valid reasons to be concerned with hiding *any* of the RIPE Database, although at the end I think it is the right thing to do. Also, this is mostly a registration database we're talking about here. If records are altered nobody will have their credit card charged, and nobody will lose their allocations; probably the worst case is that someone will be unable to get routed properly for a time. The RIPE Database keeps an entire history of all transactions, so that if authentication was compromised then the invalid changes could be rolled back easily once discovered. (At least this used to be how it works; perhaps that has changed?) There are reasons why the Database is the way it is. It is not the RIPE NCC avoiding responsibility. -- Shane <div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"> On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 10:55 +0100, virtu virtualabs wrote: > So it is up to the community to move from MD5 authentication to > stronger authentication methods ? No preventive steps would be taken > to avoid MD5 hashes disclosure on the RIPE website ? > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Nigel Titley <<a href="mailto:nigel@titley.com">nigel@titley.com</a>> > wrote: > � � � � On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 15:01 +0100, virtu virtualabs wrote: > � � � � > That would mean RIPE NCC did not do anything while people > � � � � has been > � � � � > aware of this fact since 2 years ? > > > � � � � This problem is well known, both by the RIPE DB working group > � � � � (which is > � � � � what makes the policy, not the RIPE NCC) and also the RIPE NCC > � � � � itself. > � � � � It's been discussed for many years (not just 2) and the use of > � � � � better > � � � � authentication methods has been recommended (and have also > � � � � been > � � � � available for many years). > > � � � � However, the community seems to wish to continue to use plain > � � � � text > � � � � passwords in emails, together with MD5 hashing. > > � � � � Nigel > > </div></div></blockquote></div> </div>