[dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] retaining ripe.int
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Tue Jun 30 19:53:39 CEST 2015
Hi, </hatless><shed color=blk/> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:30:39PM +0200, Romeo Zwart wrote: > Some of these domains were only registered as a "protection" > mechanism, which was considered good practice at the time. and probably still is? There's probably no actual value in keeping them for a use, but once they are relaesed, they might be "parked' in shady places of town. So unless the internal procedural cost is going to hurt - just keep'em. > ripe.int This is probably an exception for the lack of a drop catching risk, but keeping the domain to maintain a stake in the INT domain might be OK. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] retaining ripe.int
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]