[dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Wicinski
tjw.ietf at gmail.com
Mon Jun 10 11:30:14 CEST 2019
First question is (and RIPE should have the data) how many delegations do they reject because the server is an open recursor ? In today's world, I suspect it would be quite low Tim On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:23 AM Måns Nilsson <mansaxel at besserwisser.org> wrote: > Recently, a discussion regarding the checks performed by the NCC before > reverse delegation is made came up on the members-discuss list. It was > concluded that this should be discussed here rather than there. > > The members archive might not be available to all, so I'll try to > summarize. Please add your take on summary if you find mine lacking. > > The questioned practice was that the NCC rejects the delegation request > if the target server is found to be an open recursor. > > Some participants argued that this is not a technical problem, and some > said yes it is. > > Some held that the NCC has no authority blocking a request, but it was > argued that every delegation is subject to RFC 1591 responsibilites. > > For starters, are the delegation requirements described somewhere? > > Best regards, > -- > Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina > MN-1334-RIPE SA0XLR +46 705 989668 > In 1962, you could buy a pair of SHARKSKIN SLACKS, with a "Continental > Belt," for $10.99!! > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20190610/827ec3e7/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]