<HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>Re: [dns-wg] one more effort on the NTIA response</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> Ed, I believe 9 addresses some of the proposed workflows published with the NOI. It was not in either the VeriSign or ICANN proposals, but was, I believe, in some of the other diagrams. -Barb On 11/10/08 10:17 AM, "Edward Lewis" <<a href="Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz">Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz</a>> wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE>At 8:57 +0000 11/10/08, Jim Reid wrote: >can I ask for your support on this latest version? I'd be okay with this, in general, except for two things. #1 - I'd be happier without 9 - I mean, just delete it. (Why is it there? Did someone believe there was a technical justification to add an organization?) #2 - I'd be happier if the list wasn't just a set of requirements but included some "here's a way to do it"s. But then, this point is not critical. >9. There is no technical justification to create a new organisation to >oversee the process of signing of the root. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar Never confuse activity with progress. Activity pays more. </BLOCKQUOTE> </BODY> </HTML>