<html style="direction: ltr;">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<style id="bidiui-paragraph-margins" type="text/css">body p { margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt; } </style>
</head>
<body bidimailui-charset-is-forced="true" style="direction: ltr;">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/12/2021 10:07, Stephane
Bortzmeyer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:Ybrzt3T2KAXjvoQp@nic.fr">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 08:59:42AM +0100,
Moritz Müller via dns-wg <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dns-wg@ripe.net"><dns-wg@ripe.net></a> wrote
a message of 179 lines which said:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">I was wondering: Why does the EC believe that the resolvers users
currently rely on (e.g. provided by their ISP) provide
“low-quality”? Are there any studies about this?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
One possible response is that the people who write these statements
don't know what they are talking about. But of course, I cannot
believe that. So, another possible response: in Brussels, they see
that some users move away from the IAP resolver to a public resolver,
so there is probably a reason for that. (Unfortunately, DNS4EU may not
address this reason.)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>Or simply some politician traveled to Canada and said to his aide
"Why can't we do that as well?"</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.cira.ca/cybersecurity-services/canadian-shield">https://www.cira.ca/cybersecurity-services/canadian-shield</a></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>-Hank<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>