[iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gordon Lennox
gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com
Wed May 10 15:37:43 CEST 2017
Thank you Marco! This is the sort of “thing" I think was needed. Gordon > On 10 May 2017, at 15:33, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at ripe.net> wrote: > >> On 10 May 2017, at 15:20, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com <mailto:gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> But I would appreciate some clarifications from the proto-chairs - Marco? Eliot? Anna? Jim? - on how they see the time-line/objectives going forward. So what is sought on Friday? What is expected at 75? How do we work between until then? > > Hi Gordon, > > Just to clarify, as a RIPE NCC employee I can not “chair” this, this needs a few volunteers from the community. Of course as the secretariat, me and my colleagues are fully committed to support this process. I also think it is too early to fill those seats, we can think about that later. > > Anna was nice enough to volunteer to step up on Friday, there were also several people, including me, who had constraints with earlier flights back home. ////snip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20170510/9dd64992/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]