[iot-wg] re-rebooting the co-chair appointment process
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] For information: ETSI releases IoT security standard
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] appointing another co-chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Feb 26 14:42:48 CET 2019
Colleagues, we're still missing a co-chair. The last attempt to find one didn't work out. Although a couple of names were mentioned, there were very few voices of support for any of them - certainly not enough to make a sound consensus decision. It's time for one more heave. I suggest a call for nominations/volunteers/stuckees which ends on April 5th. That gives us 6 weeks for potential co-chairs to be identified and hopefully someone to emerge as the new co-chair. If the results by then are still inconclusive, I'll talk to Hans-Petter about how best to invoke article 5 of our appointment process. Let's hope it doesn't come to that. Please limit your comments on this thread to the proposed time-line and how to solve the problem of lack of WG consensus if this happens this time. I'll post another article for would be co-chairs.
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] For information: ETSI releases IoT security standard
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] appointing another co-chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]