[iot-wg] Constanze Dietrich for co-chair
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Constanze Dietrich for co-chair
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] Constanze Dietrich for co-chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matthias Waehlisch
m.waehlisch at fu-berlin.de
Fri Apr 24 10:33:54 CEST 2020
I worked with Constanze on the Rotterdam IoT Hackathon. This was productive. Support from my side! cheers matthias On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Constanze Dietrich wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > > > It’s nice to see the support for Peter as I think he’s a well eligible candidate and I > agree with his approach on many levels. That said, I’d like to provide another option by > venturing to nominate myself! > > > > TL;DR: [Jump to the last paragraph! -->] > > > > Now mostly remembered for my comics, I was introduced to the RIPE community at RIPE 74 as > part of the RACI program and spoke about my master studies on human factors as security > risks in IT operations. Later that year, I was invited to talk at the first RIPE IoT > Roundtable Meeting in Leeds where I got to discuss the implications of my studies for the > IoT, as well as the implications of rapidly and diversely spreading IoT technologies for > the RIPE NCC – the latter of which shortly after has been moved to its own working group! > :) > > > > Meanwhile, I work for an IT management consultancy and have not seen a single strategy > paper without IoT as a focus topic. Having a considerable number of clients in the energy > sector, all of them urged onto the trail of “smart everything”, I’m well and truly > concerned about the various approaches they take as, one or two steps further, the > security impact on critical infrastructures even beyond the Internet could be disastrous. > > > > We do indeed need best practices and standards, which is why such endeavours will, by all > means, get my full support. Thereby though, we should not forget that, despite existing > standards, the IoT is still a huge playground and will continue to be for the foreseeable > future. “Internet all the things!”, whether or not there’s a quality seal attached. > Hence, to date and from my point of view as someone who studies more service contracts > than she’d like, I also see a very high value in creating governance concepts for IoT > networks. The role of ISPs in this, e.g. as a kill switch, has been discussed before, and > we should develop a position on responsibilities and liability within (and outside) those > infrastructures. > > > > [-->] My specific fields of interests aside, my main goal as a co-chair is to > enable the members of the working group to get into an active exchange – be it by > co-organising another IoT hackathon and presenting the results in the IoT session which > has been (a lot of work but also) a huge pleasure for me before and during RIPE 79, by > documenting and communicating topics of the WG (with or without comics), or by providing > the enterprise perspective and a link to a variety of industries that employ IoT > technologies. We’re a comparatively new and still somewhat inactive working group and I’d > like to change that. > > > > Cheers from Berlin! > > ~ Constanze > > > -- Matthias Waehlisch . Freie Universitaet Berlin, Computer Science .. http://www.cs.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Constanze Dietrich for co-chair
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] Constanze Dietrich for co-chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]