<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">DoH? </span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">How to resolve
local add?</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">How can Enterprise
controll trafic?</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">Using DoH will
more or less switch of local DNS server, are we shure we want this?</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">Groet,</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">Eric</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New"><br>
</span>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Von:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"Jim
Reid" <jim@rfc1035.com></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">An:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"Marco
Davids" <Marco.Davids@sidn.nl></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Kopie:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"RIPE
IoT WG List" <iot-wg@ripe.net></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Datum:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">19-10-2018
18:09</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Betreff:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">Re:
[iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Gesendet
von:        </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"iot-wg"
<iot-wg-bounces@ripe.net></span>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
<br>
> On 19 Oct 2018, at 16:23, Marco Davids <Marco.Davids@sidn.nl>
wrote:<br>
> <br>
> It seems that another idea of ours, restricting access based on<br>
> DNS-queries, seems to already been incorporate in the current version
of<br>
> the draft. Cool ;-)<br>
<br>
Marco, you might be too optimistic. :-(<br>
<br>
If DoH takes off, IoT devices might well use port 443 rather than port
53 to do their lookups.<br>
<br>
IMO DoH is going to be a game-changer. And not just for IoT.<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
iot-wg mailing list<br>
iot-wg@ripe.net<br>
</span></tt><a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg"><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg</span></tt></a><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
</span></tt>
<br>
<br>