<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-unicode"> [This time with
feeling- to everyone]<br>
<p>Dear Marco and other colleagues,<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19.10.18 17:23, Marco Davids
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:cb73593d-3da8-238d-cd27-0a755229069c@sidn.nl">
<pre wrap="">That is why I believe in some additional 'MUD-features', such as
restricting bandwidth (not every fridge needs 100Mbit/s), or restricting
access to the internet only on certain hours of the day.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
I would like to bring to your attention a new draft:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-opsawg-mud-bw-profile/">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-opsawg-mud-bw-profile/</a><br>
<br>
The purpose of this draft is to describe the behavior of devices
that are MUD-capable in terms of bandwidth utilization. You will
note that the draft is marked as experimental. We can change this
designation, depending on how the work progresses. I have already
received several comments on ways in which the model can be
simplified, and several comments on how it can be otherwise
improved, having only published it a few days ago. <br>
<br>
This having been said, I solicit your thoughts and comments. In
particular:<br>
<ul>
<li>How might we assist manufacturers in completing this aspect
of the MUD file?</li>
<li>What are we missing?</li>
<li>Is the classification approach (ACLs) correct?</li>
</ul>
Eliot<br>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>