I agree, this may also be the time to consider whether the voting process can be done differently/better. Groet, Eric Von: "Gordon Lennox" <gordon.lennox.13@gmail.com> An: "IoT WG RIPE" <iot-wg@ripe.net> Kopie: "Peter Koch" <pk@DENIC.DE> Datum: 25-04-2019 09:15 Betreff: Re: [iot-wg] extension of co-chair selection process Gesendet von: "iot-wg" <iot-wg-bounces@ripe.net> <hr noshade> <tt>A pragmatic way forward? I know it is what we tend to expect from Peter. But why not? Gordon > On 25 Apr 2019, at 08:49, Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> wrote: > > Jim, all, > > for one, "expressing support" per thread is voting, not consensus building. > In that spirit, since the WG is perspectively looking for two new chairs anyway, > and both canditates do seem qualified to me while at the same time offering different > perspectives and background, I do not see a need for a continued beauty contest but > would like to suggest instead to appoint both Sandoche and Peter. That would ease the > onboarding process, as well. > When it comes to the staggered terms, we can still have the two draw straws > (well, an IoT WG should really let them draw batteries instead ...). > > Regards, > Peter _______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net </tt><a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg"><tt>https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg</tt></a><tt> </tt>