<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body> Hi Eric, <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26.10.20 14:33, Eric van Uden via iot-wg wrote: </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:OF28DBD1B4.084C8468-ONC125860D.004A1DE5-C125860D.004A7C79@avm.de"> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> Hi Eliot, I´m refering to the Stacked Router concept, so one CPE instead of two (stacked) In this case, the CPE </blockquote> Thanks. It is better for a single provider to interface with the user. Stacked CPE should certainly not be required, but nor should it be prohibited. If I don't like the pizza box my provider gives me, I might want to put something in front of it. In that case, the maker of that something might take responsibility for communicating with me about what is going on in my network. This has an impact as to whether or not everything can be done in, say, TR.369. Does this make sense? Eliot </body> </html>