[ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at instituut.net
Thu Jul 9 13:38:03 CEST 2015
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 02:23:15PM +0300, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote: > I'm not sure if people are using the fltr-martian-v6 filter set > maintained by Job Snijders: > > filter-set: fltr-martian-v6 > descr: Current IPv6 martians > mp-filter: { > 0000::/8^+, # loopback, unspecified, v4-mapped > 0200::/7^+, # Reserved by IETF [RFC4048] > 2001::/32^-, # Teredo prefix [RFC4380] > 2001:db8::/32^+, # NON-ROUTABLE range to be used for > documentation purpose [RFC3849] > 2002::/16^-, # 6to4 prefix [RFC3068] > 3ffe::/16^+, # used for the 6bone but was returned > [RFC5156] > 5f00::/8^+, # used for the 6bone but was returned > [RFC5156] > fc00::/7^+, # Unique Local Unicast [RFC4193] > fe80::/10^+, # Link Local Unicast [RFC4291] > fec0::/10^+, # Reserved by IETF [RFC3879] > ff00::/8^+ # Multicast [RFC4291] > } > > I'm trying to figure out why prefixes like 0200::/7 or 0400::/6 are not > included in this list 0200::/7 was already there. > Any ideas? The answer is simple: Vurt:~ job$ whois fltr-martian-v6 | grep manual remarks: this object is manually maintained I've just updated it, manually :-) Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]