[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Riccardo Gori
rgori at wirem.net
Fri Oct 4 07:24:14 CEST 2019
Hello Jen Link, Il 03/10/2019 13:55, Jens Link ha scritto: > Uros Gaber <uros at ub330.net> writes: > >> 1. WHY should it have NAT > NATs are good. They provide security. Are you sure you are about networking? > >> 2. What do you understand under class, IPv4 "Classes" are just defined >> subnet groups (simply put) > Things need names. Numbers are hard to remember. We have Class-A for /8, > Class-B for /16 and Class-C for /24. We need names for the others as > well. > >> 3. AFAIK DHCPv6 is defined in RFC (3319,3646,4704,5007,6221,6355,6939,8415) > But it's DHCPv6. Not DHCP! It works differently. And Android does not > support it. Enterprise Customers want DHCP! > >> 6. Dots and colon, what's the difference? > I have do change my regex. > >> 7. Use DNS to resolve - no [] needed then. > DNS is to hard, to complex and fails to often. And in enterprise > networks it probably done by another team. > >> [5] what does the script have to do with network layer? > The script was just an example for software breaking when you implement > something that looks completely different like IPv4. I this case the > script is parsing log files and netflow data and we are back to the > regex. > > Jens __ Riccardo
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]