[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michel Py
michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us
Sat Oct 5 23:02:27 CEST 2019
> Job Snijders wrote : > I've observed IPv6 hitting a plateau (even a slight decrease!) in usage > of IPv6 across multiple large networks measured over significant time. I was expecting more than not even 3% IPv6 at AMSIX. I don't call it "significant time" yet. IMHO, it will take a few more years before we get a clear picture. IPv6 will plateau, I just don't think we know where and when yet. Or do we ? > However, if IPv4 and IPv6 grow at the same rate, my interpretation would be that IPv4 use is not declining, > thus IPv6 isn't growing, and we should indeed be discussing the current failing of IPv6. I did not start this thread, but it is time to acknowledge that talks of 100% IPv6 are not something that should be on the table at this time. > ps. Before we venture into a tit-for-tat where we trade pictures of decline (e.g. IXP stats) against pictures > of growth (google stats), I'd like to learn more why we see what we see in the current decline graphs. Do you measure what is happening on private interconnects ? MMR traffic ? I would guess that a good part of the IPv6 traffic is between large players, and that somehow they may have changed their peering scheme ? Michel.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]