[ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philip Homburg
pch-ripeml at u-1.phicoh.com
Fri May 29 14:00:08 CEST 2020
>That also means actively using, promoting and preferring IPv6 only >services. (I'm assuming that IPv6 only meens a service that is reachable only over IPv6 and not IPv4) I don't see why promoting communication failures is a good thing. Except possibly as a fun thing to nudge people to take action. For example a quiz with prizes could be hosted on an IPv6-only platform. >And not accepting hardware, software or platforms which >lack features in IPv6 only environments. I don't know where to put it, but there may be a benefit for a list that lists known internet services that do not (or poorly) support IPv6 and with replacements that do support them. Such a list may have two advantages: 1) Somebody who likes to promote IPv6 would not have to spend time looking for good alternatives to known brands 2) Being on a list of backward companies is bad pr for any company, so it may stimulate companies to get off the wrong part of the list.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]