<html><body> I agree with Fernando. WBR, Dmitry Menzulskiy, AKA DM3740-RIPE <img width="16" height="16" src="cid:1__=4CBBFC53DFBB85AB8f9e8a93d@abn.beeline.ru" border="0" alt="Inactive hide details for Garc��a Fern��ndez, Fernando <Fernando.Garcia@tecnocom.es>">Garc��a Fern��ndez, Fernando <Fernando.Garcia@tecnocom.es> <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"><td style="background-image:url(cid:2__=4CBBFC53DFBB85AB8f9e8a93d@abn.beeline.ru); background-repeat: no-repeat; " width="40%"> <ul> <ul> <ul> <ul>Garc��a Fern��ndez, Fernando <Fernando.Garcia@tecnocom.es> ��: ipv6-wg-admin@ripe.net 04.02.2010 01:56</ul> </ul> </ul> </ul> </td><td width="60%"> <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"><td width="1%"><img width="73" height="1" src="cid:3__=4CBBFC53DFBB85AB8f9e8a93d@abn.beeline.ru" border="0" alt=""> <div align="right">��ާ�</div></td><td width="100%"><img width="1" height="1" src="cid:3__=4CBBFC53DFBB85AB8f9e8a93d@abn.beeline.ru" border="0" alt=""> "ipv6-wg@ripe.net" <ipv6-wg@ripe.net></td></tr> <tr valign="top"><td width="1%"><img width="73" height="1" src="cid:3__=4CBBFC53DFBB85AB8f9e8a93d@abn.beeline.ru" border="0" alt=""> <div align="right">��ڧ�</div></td><td width="100%"><img width="1" height="1" src="cid:3__=4CBBFC53DFBB85AB8f9e8a93d@abn.beeline.ru" border="0" alt=""> </td></tr> <tr valign="top"><td width="1%"><img width="73" height="1" src="cid:3__=4CBBFC53DFBB85AB8f9e8a93d@abn.beeline.ru" border="0" alt=""> <div align="right">��֧ާ�</div></td><td width="100%"><img width="1" height="1" src="cid:3__=4CBBFC53DFBB85AB8f9e8a93d@abn.beeline.ru" border="0" alt=""> Re: [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208</td></tr> </table> <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"><td width="58"><img width="1" height="1" src="cid:3__=4CBBFC53DFBB85AB8f9e8a93d@abn.beeline.ru" border="0" alt=""></td><td width="336"><img width="1" height="1" src="cid:3__=4CBBFC53DFBB85AB8f9e8a93d@abn.beeline.ru" border="0" alt=""></td></tr> </table> </td></tr> </table> <tt>After reading their own introduction and knowing both candidates from several RIPE meetings, I give my support to both of them to be co-chairs. I think and odd number is good as break in discussions. El 03/02/2010, a las 23:44, David Kessens escribi��: > > All, > > The call for candidates for co-chairs of the IPv6 working group has > resulted in two candidates. See below for their names and a link to the > mailing list with their motivations and plans for the working group: > > Shane Kerr > </tt><tt><a href="http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/ipv6-wg/2010/msg00038.html">http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/ipv6-wg/2010/msg00038.html</a></tt><tt> > > Marco Hogewoning > </tt><tt><a href="http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/ipv6-wg/2010/msg00041.html">http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/ipv6-wg/2010/msg00041.html</a></tt><tt> > > This brings us to the next step in our process: > > 1) The nominees are given a chance to determine whether they want to > be considered or withdraw as they decided that there are other > good candidates already available > > 2) The community may express opinions that could help the > candidates to come to a decision on whether they want to > be continued to be considered as a candidate > - the community may consider appointing more than one co-chair > in case of several good candidates > > Let's take until the end of Mon Feb 8, 2010 in a timezone of your > choice to determine an outcome for both 1) and 2). > > I already have seen some discussion regarding point 2) and it leads me > to believe that there is at least some support to appoint both > candidates as co-chairs. > > Before making such a determination though, I would like to see a bit > more discussion/comments, especially from people who have not taken a > position yet on this topic. > > Basically, knowing our candidates, I would like to hear from you > whether you prefer to appoint one or two co-chairs, and whether you > have any preference for either candidate in case you believe one > co-chair is enough. > > Note that this period is for open discussion and that it is perfectly > fine to do alternate proposals. > > Our objective is to see if we can come to a consensus which allows us > to avoid more complex ways of making a selection such as a vote. > > After our discussion period is over, I will determine if there is > enough basis to do a Last Call to confirm a selection decision as > determined from our discussion phase, or whether we perhaps need a bit > more time for discussion or that we will have to resort to organizing > a vote. > > I hope this helps, > > David Kessens > --- > -- Tecnocom Fernando Garc��a Fern��ndez D.G. Integraci��n de Redes y Sistemas Josefa Valcarcel, 26 Edificio Merrimack III Madrid - 28027 Tel. Fijo: 901900900 ext 40383 Fax: (+34) 914313240 Tel. M��vil: (+34) 649428591 E-mail: fernando.garcia@tecnocom.es </tt><tt><a href="http://www.tecnocom.es">http://www.tecnocom.es</a></tt><tt> </tt> </body></html>