<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
Thanks Carlos for the congrats, and to all of you who supported / voted a very big thank you!<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
In the v6wg session @ripe80 and later on the list we had a discussion on "why it is so hard to implement v6" initiated by Wilhelm B. I hope we can continue these discussions, and see how to find solutions for these.
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
I dont know what kind of table we need 😎,if at all, but i guess you all know and want that v6 would be the new normal.
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
I cannot speed things up by myself, 😊 but i am convinced this workinggroup has potential.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
Thanks,<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
Ray<span id="ms-outlook-android-cursor"></span><br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<span id="OutlookSignature">
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
Lähetetty <a href="https://aka.ms/blhgte">Outlook Mobilesta</a></div>
</span><br>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Carlos Friaças <cfriacas@fccn.pt><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 15, 2020 8:38:50 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Jetten Raymond <raymond.jetten@elisa.fi><br>
<b>Cc:</b> RIPE IPv6-WG <ipv6-wg@ripe.net><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv4 Flag Day</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText"><br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
Is seems you are on the Board now -- Congratulations! -- so perhaps you <br>
can try to speed this thing up... :-)))))))))<br>
<br>
Maybe a round-table, a square-table or something like that with the <br>
(other) big guys...?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Carlos<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Fri, 15 May 2020, Jetten Raymond wrote:<br>
<br>
> But only 2030, not any earlier ?<br>
> <br>
> We would need IPv6+ or something before that then ??? ?<br>
> <br>
> Cheers<br>
> Ray<br>
> <br>
> ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br>
> Kohteesta: ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg-bounces@ripe.net> henkilön Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie> puolesta<br>
> Lähetetty: perjantaina 15. toukokuuta 2020 klo 19.44<br>
> Vastaanottaja: RIPE IPv6-WG<br>
> Aihe: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv4 Flag Day<br>
> <br>
> On 15 May 2020, at 15:40, Nick Hilliard wrote:<br>
> <br>
> > There doesn't seem to be any indication that the vendors named on the<br>
> > page have committed to this plan.<br>
> <br>
> That too!<br>
> My focus was on the usefulness of the test tool.<br>
> <br>
> Niall<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
></div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>