<div><div dir="auto">Hello </div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I think its good idea, and it will better if the charge is more as the account has more addresses, exactly like income tax, this is fair and I think it will make available address for accounts like me. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Thanks </div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:54 AM <<a href="mailto:ripe-lr@cidr.eu">ripe-lr@cidr.eu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="text-align:left"><div><span style="font-size:14px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:14px">That does not have anything to do with equal rights. All LIRs already have equal rights even if they use multiple LIR accounts.</span></div><div><span style="font-size:14px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:14px">We already had that scheme and it was removed for good reason. RIPE NCC does not sell internet number resources and the effort for checking requests for IPv4 has gone due the one IPv4 /22 per LIR policy change. A change in favour of IPv4 is useless too, because IPv4 allocations are already done with the exception of allocations made from the old stock pool.</span></div><div><span style="font-size:14px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:14px">We should not try to get back space the next one hundred years, especially not by using such methods, otherwise that will never end.</span></div><br><br><hr style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial;font-size:14px;border-width:0px 0px 1px;border-top-style:initial;border-right-style:initial;border-left-style:initial;border-top-color:initial;border-right-color:initial;border-left-color:initial;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:rgb(218,218,218)"><b style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">From:</b><span style="font-size:14px"> TrustHost <</span><a href="http:///email/new/1/trusthostt%40yandex.ru" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial;font-size:14px" target="_blank">trusthostt@yandex.ru</a><span style="font-size:14px">></span><br><b style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">Sent:</b><span style="font-size:14px"> Wednesday, 16. Jan 2019 – 14:16 CET +0100</span><br><b style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">To:</b> <a href="http:///email/new/1/members-discuss%40ripe.net" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial;font-size:14px" target="_blank">members-discuss@ripe.net</a><br><br><b style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">Subject:</b><span style="font-size:14px"> [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme</span><br><br></div><div>
<div>Hi.</div><div> </div><div>I think it would be great if the payment depends on the quantity the resources for one account. It would help to return unused IPv4 in free pool for new business. The companies, who really use big networks won't notice such changes. But who received the resources before 2012 and has unused /19 and maybe more will think if they really need such big blocks.</div><div> </div><div>For example we can implement the next charging scheme.</div><div>If one account has more than /20 (not equivalent 4x/22 or the blocks were allocated before 2012) the next /22 ownership will cost some price (e.g. 1400 euro).</div><div> </div><div>For example:</div><div>There is /17 IPv4 block for one LIR account.</div><div>/17 = 32x/22.</div><div>The total price for this account is (32-4)*1400 = 39 200 euro.</div><div> </div><div>I think the members must have equal rights, regardless of the year of the membership started.</div><div> </div><div>------------------</div><div>Kind regards,<br>Boris Loginov</div><div> </div><div>TrustHost LLC</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
members-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net" target="_blank">members-discuss@ripe.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/info%40together-pal.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/info%40together-pal.com</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>