<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Vevida,</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
The specs you can see in my first post.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Regarding FPGA - as I already explained in my first post and I need to repeat and to spam the list because of you - any end-device (can it be ASIC / FPGA / Windows operating system / Linux operating system / etc) will not be able to speak IPv4+ unless it will
be updated/upgraded, but even if it will not be updated/upgraded it will still be able to speak IPv4 exactly like it is now, the internet will not break, it will just be able to reach IPv4 destination addresses - exactly like it is working now.<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Now let us all be quiet and respect the list.<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Respectfully,</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Elad<br>
</div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Vevida Hostmaster <hostmaster@vevida.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 1, 2020 2:38 PM<br>
<b>Cc:</b> members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [members-discuss] Good to know</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText"><br>
On 01-05-2020 13:11, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:<br>
><br>
> This mailing list, IMHO, is not intended for such technical<br>
> discussions at all.<br>
> Starting with the fact that most likely relevant experts not present<br>
> here,<br>
> who can give reasoned answers/proposals<br>
> (for example, those who develop chipsets for network equipment).<br>
><br>
True that. This is no place for that. Buteven *if* there would be<br>
someone who actually created an FPGA or three for routing he would still<br>
continue to talk bullcrap, and say that he would not know what he talks<br>
about, bending the subject.<br>
<br>
Fact is, there only hollow words, no spec, no RFC, no PoC, no nothing.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Arjen<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
members-discuss mailing list<br>
members-discuss@ripe.net<br>
<a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss">https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io">
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io</a><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>