<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="ltr" style="">
<div style=""></div>
<div style="">
<div>I would kindly note that the assumptions regarding future fiscal years� budgets (2023 onward) vary somewhat from the realized budget. Is it better to work with the wrong pre-assumptions made some years ago or with the actual numbers in the same situation?</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div>At least to me, when reading that PowerPoint, it seems like people at the top and everyone who saw that presentation had to be aware of a potential future budget deficit. <span style="font-size: inherit;">Rather than rein in on expenditure in time, it
 has instead increased since.</span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size: inherit;"><br>
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: inherit;">Calling "comment on two billing models exercise" as something else than "finding a way to raise prices that can be agreed on by most" seems to me as somewhat intellectual dishonesty.</span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Now, if indeed the 2024 budget will be on the level of the 2024E budget mentioned in the presentation, yes, we can all stop here.<span style="font-size: inherit;"> </span><span style="font-size: inherit;">I apologize for wasting everyone�s time
 and bandwidth. :)</span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Kaj</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Sent from my iPhone</div>
</div>
<div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container" class="ms-outlook-mobile-reference-message">
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif"><b>From:</b> Nick Hilliard <nick@netability.ie><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, March 9, 2023 5:54 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Kaj Niemi <kajtzu@basen.net><br>
<b>Cc:</b> members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
<div> </div>
</font></div>
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Kaj Niemi wrote on 09/03/2023 13:59:<br>
> Still, when the CFO equivalent for an organization comes asking for <br>
> alternatives on how to raise prices to meet projected future budget from <br>
> its customers (membership) I think it is super useful to look critically <br>
> at what that organization spends its revenue on.<br>
<br>
This mischaracterises where this discussion is coming from.  The aim is <br>
not to find some new way to raise prices - that can be done in the <br>
existing model by just raising the prices.  This discussion is the <br>
continuation of a community engagement process started in 2021, and <br>
outlined here:<br>
<br>
> <a href="https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ripe.net%2Fparticipate%2Fmeetings%2Fgm%2Fmeetings%2Fnovember-2021%2Fdocumentation-and-archive%2Fripe-ncc-charging-scheme-models.pdf&data=05%7C01%7C%7C767d28c64afb4fee08f708db20b69032%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638139740715680312%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=kVRDUgKUo96PCROWibFFFGlp83WA0W11YTmVyocMZDw%3D&reserved=0" style="">
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ripe.net%2Fparticipate%2Fmeetings%2Fgm%2Fmeetings%2Fnovember-2021%-and-archive%2Fripe-ncc-charging-scheme-models.pdf&data=05%7C01%7C%7C767d28c64afb4fee08f708db20b69032%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638139740715680312%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=kVRDUgKUo96PCROWibFFFGlp83WA0W11YTmVyocMZDw%3D&reserved=0</a><br>
<br>
I.e. it's the outcome of a member's survey initiated in 2020 on what <br>
people wanted from the RIPE NCC. Page 3 includes:<br>
<br>
> Survey Findings<br>
> � There was a clear majority in favour of charging based on resources held<br>
<br>
So, the membership wanted a discussion on the pricing model, and this is <br>
now where we are.<br>
<br>
In relation to the activity plan, the RIPE NCC presents this <br>
centre-stage to the membership every year. Here's the FY2023 Plan:<br>
<br>
> <a href="https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ripe.net%2Fparticipate%2Fmeetings%2Fgm%2Fmeetings%2Foctober-2022%2Fdocumentation-and-archive%2Fdraft-ripe-ncc-activity-plan-and-budget-2023&data=05%7C01%7C%7C767d28c64afb4fee08f708db20b69032%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638139740715680312%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=DmgStRGF9A2zSyXjd2BkqZ0bhnpFmMNr8CleKp2Hr8g%3D&reserved=0" style="">
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ripe.net%2Fparticipate%2Fmeetings%2Fgm%2Fmeetings%2Foctober-2022%2Fdocumentation-and-archive%2Fdraft-ripe-ncc-activity-plan-and-budget-2023&data=05%7C01%7C%7C767d28c64afb4fee08f708db20b69032%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638139740715680312%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=DmgStRGF9A2zSyXjd2BkqZ0bhnpFmMNr8CleKp2Hr8g%3D&reserved=0</a><br>
<br>
There's a breakdown of costs on Page 6. I agree that it's important to <br>
discuss this too, but it's a separate discussion which can easily be <br>
decoupled from a pricing model.<br>
<br>
Nick<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>