[ncc-services-wg] 2007-01 Implementation: Model agreement and charging requirements?
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] New Documents available
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Outage report for the RIPE Database services
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Mar 4 00:21:08 CET 2009
Dear Andrea, NCC Team, thanks for the calrifications! Everything appears to be reasonably under control by now :-) Best regards, Wilfried. _____________________________________________________________________________ Andrea Cima wrote: > Dear Wilfried, > > Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > >> The announcement about implemntation of 2007-01 was distributed on >> Feb, 12, 2009, pointing to: >> >> http://www.ripe.net/membership/lir-end-user-requirements.html >> >> At the bottom of this page there is the phrase: >> >> "A model agreement and its terms will be provided here shortly." >> >> Can we still expect to see such a model text before March 3, 2009, the >> "effective date" of implementation? >> >> > > > The model agreement will be published before March 3. > This model will be based on the "Contractual Requirements for Provider > Independent Resource Holders in the RIPE NCC Service Region", document > which was created in conjunction with policy proposal 2007-01: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-new-draft2007-01-v4.html > >> In particular, I am interested in guidance on: >> >> "End User must pay an annual maintenance fee to the LIR for the >> resources." >> >> > > > The "Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resource Holders > in the RIPE NCC Service Region" document, states that all contracts > should include: "Notice that the resource holder is obliged to pay an > annual fee to the LIR for the resources". > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-new-draft2007-01-v4.html > >> because I wouldn't want to implement a separate charging scheme for our >> customers holding PI resources, and which already do have a contract and >> are charged for our connectivity services on a less granular basis. >> >> Of course, a surcharge of 0,-- <put currency code here> would be fine :-) >> >> > > > This is fine, as long as you have specified it in the contract. > > I hope this clarifies the matter for you. If you have any further > questions don't hesitate to let me know. > > Best regards, > > Andrea Cima > RIPE NCC > >> Regards, >> Wilfried. >> >> > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] New Documents available
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Outage report for the RIPE Database services
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]