[ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Wed Jun 9 10:56:21 CEST 2010
On 8 Jun 2010, at 15:55, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > Shane Kerr wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 12:37 +0200, Denis Walker wrote: >>> If we make it optional now, although it is still in the RPSL definition, >>> it can be completely ignored. Does anyone have any strong views on this >>> either way? >> I'd actually suggest going further, and getting rid of it completely. > If it doesn't dere a purpose any longer, yes, I agree. I agree, let's do this. [...] > IIRC, the "usual" approach was to deal with such a change in phases, like > issue a warning for a while, then refuse an update if it violates the > acceptable schema, and eventually cleaning up old objects that haven't been > touched for a looong time. > > I'm sure the DB guys can refresh our memory regarding the specifics. This sounds like the way forward with regards to implementation too. Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]