[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Tue Feb 5 13:47:38 CET 2013
Randy Bush wrote: [...] >>It also provides multiple options for LRHs to completely ignore the >>RIPE NCC forever. I don't believe that this constitutes good >>stewardship of resource registration on the part of the RIPE NCC. > > > unfortunately, that is the status quo. and we kind of have a historical > obligation to allow them to ignore the ncc. but perhaps a carrot, as > opposed to a stick, can significantly improve this. Indeed. Coming back after stating my general support yesterday, to one of the individual issues that may benefit from changes: I don't remember who already pointed fingers at the ROA service (thanks!), but we - eventually - may have a pretty convincing carrot by offering the "Certification of these data;" (which I read as being ROA and future friends) only to LHRs that have established a formal relationship and are paying for the service according to 2.1 ... 2.4. Certification is a service that has been developed recently by the RIRs, so IMO there is no legacy "right" here. This would apply for the cases described in 2.5 and certainly 2.6. [...] > --- > > i think sander said it well: +1 Wilfried >>This proposal tries to bring the legacy resource holders and the RIPE >>NCC together under mutually acceptable conditions to create a >>situation of good stewardship as far as possible. It won't be perfect. >>Address space got given away without any conditions attached at the >>beginning of the internet, and now we have to deal with that. > > > suggestions on how to better achieve these goals would be greatly > appreciated of course. > > randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]