[ncc-services-wg] Voluntary Transfer Lock V2

Hello for everyone!

In general I agree with the new policy text, thanks for all your efforts
and work.

But I also have some questions and wishes.

There are some notices in the Impact Analysis as «There might be situations
where the RIPE NCC cannot enforce the Lock. If the RIPE NCC receives a
legally binding decision/order related to Internet number resources under a
Lock, the RIPE NCC will have to comply with the order. The RIPE NCC might
also not be able to enforce the Lock if it is against any applicable laws
or regulations». Can you concretize what does it mean «binding
decision/order»? And when you write about the «any applicable lows and
regulations» - what exactly it meant by this? The same applies to the text
of the policy itself in the paragraph Implementation Choices when you wrote
about restrictions from any applicable laws or regulations. It is not clear
what applicable lows do you mean. Because for example for Ukrainian holders
it can be read as you can apply also low of occupying authorities.

And my wish is to clarify all exceptions of the inability to enforce the
lock and provide a comprehensive list of cases that constitute an
exception, or provide criteria for determining the relevant situations in
further accompanying documents or in the final version of the policy.
Because the lack of clarity may lead to inconsistent decision-making and
the implementation of the RIPE NCC blocking mechanism.

With best regards to everyone,


Maxim Smelyanets.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20230829/be24ee02/attachment.html>