[ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 Voluntary Transfer Lock
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 Voluntary Transfer Lock
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 Voluntary Transfer Lock
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Kennedy
jameskennedy001 at gmail.com
Fri May 12 12:34:35 CEST 2023
Hello, > Why don't we keep it simple? Let's modify ripe-682 and include an opt out clause to disallow transfers. If you invoke this opt out it is a part of ripe-682 so you are not violating it. All the transfer rules are in one policy, self contained and consistent. +1. This is the best permanent solution that I've heard so far. It would take some time to get through the PDP though, and a transfer lock mechanism is urgently needed by some members immediately. So I also support 2023-03 as a stopgap. 2023-03 may contradict ripe-682 as Denis flagged, but IMHO it's more important to get a ‘better-than-nothing’ temporary solution implemented ASAP. Regards, James
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 Voluntary Transfer Lock
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 Voluntary Transfer Lock
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]