[atlas] one-off UDMs more expensive?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] one-off UDMs more expensive?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Vlaar
pvlaar at afilias.info
Mon Aug 10 13:48:56 CEST 2015
On 10/8/15 1:30 PM, Robert Kisteleki wrote: > One-offs are more expensive for the system to execute: they need immediate > scheduling and result delivery is done with priority for example, so they > cost more. Aha, in that case, I would love to see the possibility to request one-off measurements that do not require to be immediately scheduled, and for which result delivery is not done with any priority over periodical ones. Alternatively, I could also just create a regular periodical UDM and specify a stop time in the near future, in order to save credits upon doing measurements that need to be run only once. Trying that gives me an interesting result though: I can't place the stop time within 2 hours of the current time, is that to be expected? ~paul
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] one-off UDMs more expensive?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]