[atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
carsten at schiefner.de
Tue Feb 16 17:46:04 CET 2021
+1 - what Bengt says. Best, -C. On 16.02.2021 17:40, Bengt Gördén wrote: > On 2021-02-16 15:55, Avamander wrote: >> some may find it controversial, but I don't think any effort should be >> spent at extending the life of IPv4. In this case, by extending the >> address space. > > I don't agree. This is a measurement tool. Whatever people think about > extending or not extending the lifetime of ipv4 is irrelevant. It > shouldn't hinder measurements of said networks. If there's networks out > there that pass 0/8 and 240/4 it's VERY relevant to measure it. Just > because you can't see it it doesn't mean it's not there. > > > -- > /bengan
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]