[atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philip Homburg
philip.homburg at ripe.net
Thu Feb 18 12:06:17 CET 2021
On 2021/02/17 17:56 , Randy Bush wrote: >> I just did a small experiment with the probe firmware. Allowing >> 240.0.0.0/4 and 0.0.0.0/8 is a two line change. I tested this on V3 >> and V4 probes and on CentOS 7. In all 3 cases, the linux kernel does >> support 240.0.0.0/4 and does not support 0.0.0.0/8. > > so, what experiment(s) do you think would be useful once some capable > probes deploy? Traceroute seems to be the only measurement that makes sense. I noticed that my first hop router sends an error ICMP, but I don't get anything beyond that. >> We are not going to releasing new firmware for V1 and V2 (except to >> address security issues). > > i can not get to my v1 probes during covid lockdown even if you shipped > replacements to me :( < snif > Yes, it is amazing that corona doesn't seem to have much in the number of probes that are connected. > will you upgrade soft probes? or send instructions? For a binary install of the CentOS RPM it should be automatic. For debian based, it is a matter of compiling a new .deb and upgrading (manually). Philip
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]